These 2 clips dwell on the best aspects of life and earth and ignore the horrors of existence. This still takes us back to the fundamental question: Where did a god come from with the power and intelligence to create?
If such a god can pre-exist without a creator of its own, then why can't nature develop over billions of years of trial and error? It's estimated that 96% of all creatures that have lived are now extinct. Those that have survived on this small planet have survived against massive odds; so natural history shows a pattern of mostly failure. If a god is responsible, should we not expect a higher success rate?
Its easy to talk about beautiful flowers and sunsets but that is not the whole reality. The strange assortment of creatures that have survived are a long way from ideal. Take the blind mole, the ostrich that cannot fly, the fish without eyes caused by living in dark caves for millions of years. We have poisonous snakes, insects that eat their prey alive. Then there is the fearsome Komodo dragon, which has a mouth so foul that it bites its prey and then waits for it to die of infection after a few days; the creation of a god-of-love?
Then there is the brutality of human history, including gladiators - lets not even go there! Why stop at one god? Why not have a few hundred as did the Greeks and Romans?